Relationships never replace criteria.
We define fit, risk, and scope before introductions, listings,
or execution discussions move forward.
Many failed export attempts are never documented publicly.
What surfaces instead are repeated mismatch patterns —
in fit, documentation, expectations, and execution readiness.
Standards define what must be reviewed before introductions,
listings, or execution discussions move forward.
Approach
Stillmark Accord works quietly and documents carefully.
We support brands and distributors that value clarity over speed.
We believe good decisions come from transparency, responsibility, and long-term thinking — not from noise or urgency.
We operate before introductions. Evidence-scoped fit-and-risk reviews — in writing.
Our Principles
Transparency — Clear thinking begins with honesty.
Responsibility — Every decision carries weight.
Long-term thinking — What lasts matters more than what moves fast.
Standards are published before any review and do not change per client.
A standards-led review sequence — examining materials through criteria, scope, evidence, and readiness before introductions move forward.
Ingredient transparency
INCI is complete and clearly disclosed.
Sources are traceable.
We require:
Full INCI list (including fragrance/allergen disclosure where relevant)
Supplier specifications and CoA where available
Batch-level traceability
Standard #01
Safety & stability
Safety is supported.
Stability is demonstrated for intended use.
We require:
• Stability and compatibility documentation
• Packaging compatibility notes
• Clear rationale for storage conditions, expiry, and shelf life
Standard #02
Microbiological quality
Microbial risk is controlled and verified.
We require:
• Microbiological test results
• Manufacturing hygiene controls
• Preservative approach and supporting summaries (if applicable)
Standard #03
Claims integrity
Language matches evidence.
We require:
• Claim substantiation documentation
• Clinical or consumer test summaries (where used)
• Clear methodology, limitations, and scope of claims
Standard #04
Manufacturing discipline
Processes are repeatable and documented.
We require:
• QC checkpoints and batch records
• Handling of deviations and corrective actions
• Supplier evaluation or audit materials (if available)
Standard #05
Traceability & responsibility
Responsibility is visible and accountable.
We require:
• Clearly identified responsible party
• Complaint handling process
• Documentation completeness and recall readiness (where applicable)
Standard #06
Standard #07
Channel integrity
Channel presence is intentional and controlled.
We require:
• Documented channel approval by the brand
• Pricing consistency across markets
No unauthorized distribution or grey market presence
Clear exit or termination terms per channel
Decision Outcomes
Pass — Verified evidence meets the standard
Hold — Meets intent; defined corrections or additional evidence required
Fail — Does not meet key standards; insufficient evidence or documentation
Request a private review
Define fit, risk, and documentation scope before introductions move forward
Confidential. Scope-first. Standards-led.